Stralya

AI

Predictive model consulting

Demand forecasts, churn scores, failure warnings, fraud flags and pricing signals, tested on past data and run in shadow before they touch a live decision, then watched for drift.

ForecastingChurn predictionFraud detection

In short

Predictive models are statistical or machine learning models that estimate a future value or the likelihood of an event, such as next month’s demand, a customer leaving or a machine failing, from historical data. Stralya builds them around a clear business decision, backtests them on past periods, runs them in shadow and monitors them for drift.

2 to 4 weeks

Feasibility check

Data history, target definition and a baseline forecast before committing to a full build.

3 to 9 months

To production

Typical span from framing to a monitored model feeding a live business decision.

Dubai and Paris

Offices

Stralya works from offices in the United Arab Emirates and France.

What are predictive models?

A predictive model uses historical data to estimate something not yet known: how many units will sell next week, which customers are likely to cancel, when a pump is likely to fail, whether a transaction looks fraudulent, or what price will clear the market. Its output is a number or a probability that feeds a decision.

That decision is the point. A forecast nobody acts on has no value, and a churn score with no retention action attached is just a report. Every predictive model we build starts from the decision it supports, the cost of being wrong in each direction and the lead time the business needs to act.

The family includes time-series forecasting, classification models that estimate the probability of an event, survival models that estimate when it will happen, and anomaly detection. They follow the discipline of general machine learning delivery, with one addition: they must be tested on the past as if it were the future. They are part of our AI consulting practice.

Signs you need predictive models

Prediction pays when the business makes the same forward-looking decision many times, and when acting earlier is worth something. These are the signals we hear most often from operations, finance and customer teams.

  • Planning runs on last year plus a percentage

    Stock, staffing or capacity are set from simple rules, and the business either runs short or carries too much.

  • You learn about churn after the customer leaves

    Retention teams react to cancellations instead of early signals, when it is too late to change the outcome.

  • Maintenance happens either too early or too late

    Equipment is serviced on a calendar, wasting parts, or after breakdowns, losing production time.

  • Fraud review queues grow faster than the team

    Analysts check transactions in arrival order rather than by risk, so the riskiest ones wait the longest.

  • An existing forecast is trusted by nobody

    A model exists, but planners override it so often that it has become a formality.

The last sign matters more than it seems. A forecast that planners override is usually missing something they know: a promotion calendar, a supplier constraint, a local event. Bringing that knowledge into the model, or into the process around it, is often the fastest gain available.

What our predictive modeling engagement covers

The deliverables are designed so that the business can judge the model before relying on it, and keep judging it afterwards. Each one is written for the people who will use the predictions, not only for the people who build them.

  • Target and decision definition

    What exactly is predicted, over which horizon, at which level of detail, and which action follows each prediction.

  • Historical data audit

    Length and consistency of history, missing periods, changes in definitions, and the external signals worth adding.

  • Baseline and candidate models

    A naive forecast or simple score first, then models that must beat it on the metric the business cares about.

  • Backtesting and validation report

    Performance measured on past periods the model never saw, by segment and by horizon, with the errors explained.

  • Shadow deployment and drift monitoring

    Predictions logged against real outcomes before going live, then tracked for drift with a retraining trigger.

Predictions come with a measure of uncertainty whenever the method allows it. A demand forecast given as a single number hides the risk; a range lets planners decide how much safety stock to hold, and a probability lets a retention team choose whom to call first.

Can your data predict this?

A feasibility check typically takes 2 to 4 weeks and ends with a baseline forecast and a go or no-go recommendation.

Book a free discovery call

How we build forecasts: four phases

The sequence is built to fail cheaply. A model that cannot beat the baseline in backtesting never reaches production, and that decision is made with numbers rather than impressions or the enthusiasm of a demo.

PHASE 01

Define

Decision, target, horizon, error costs and history audit.

PHASE 02

Backtest

Baseline and candidates tested on unseen past periods.

PHASE 03

Shadow

Live predictions logged against outcomes, not yet acted on.

PHASE 04

Operate

Go-live, drift monitoring, retraining and feedback loop.

Backtesting uses rolling windows: the model is trained on data up to a date, predicts the following period, then the window moves forward. This reproduces how the model will be used in practice and exposes the periods where it fails, such as a holiday season or a supply disruption, before the business discovers them live.

Which prediction approach fits your problem?

The right technique depends on what you predict and how the prediction is used. The table summarizes the main families we work with and the points that most often decide whether they succeed.

ProblemTypical approachKey inputWatch out for
Demand forecastingTime-series models with calendar and promotion featuresSeveral seasons of consistent historyStructural breaks such as a new sales channel
Churn predictionClassification giving a probability per customerUsage and support history before churnPredicting churn too late to act
Failure anticipationSurvival or anomaly models on sensor dataLabeled failures and maintenance logsVery few failure examples
Fraud detectionClassification combined with anomaly detectionConfirmed fraud cases and analyst decisionsFraudsters adapting to the model
Real-time pricingDemand response models with guardrailsPrice, volume and competitor historyFeedback loops distorting the data

Fraud and pricing models share a difficulty: the model changes the behavior it measures. Fraudsters adapt and customers react to prices, so these models need shorter retraining cycles and closer monitoring. We design that feedback loop from the start rather than adding it after the first surprise.

Risks and drift in predictive models

Predictive models fail differently from other software. They keep running and keep producing numbers, even when those numbers are wrong. The risks below are the ones we design against from the first phase.

  • Look-ahead bias

    Using data that was not available at prediction time makes backtests look better than reality. We rebuild features as of each date.

  • Concept drift

    The link between inputs and outcome changes, after a pricing change or a new competitor. Monitoring compares predictions with outcomes continuously.

  • Self-fulfilling predictions

    A churn score that triggers discounts changes who churns, which corrupts the next training set. Control groups measure the effect.

  • Automation without a fallback

    If the model or its data feed fails, the process needs a safe default. Every deployment defines one.

When a model drifts, the response is planned: an alert, an investigation by a named owner, retraining on recent data and validation before the new version replaces the old. That routine is documented at handover so your team can run it without us.

Predictive model pricing

Every engagement starts with a diagnosis and ends with a fixed quote. Durations are typical, not promised.

FormatDurationPrice
Feasibility check2 to 4 weeksFixed quote after diagnosis
Forecast or scoring model to production3 to 9 monthsFixed quote after the assessment
Drift monitoring and retrainingMonthlyMonthly fee quoted at handover

What changes the price: length and quality of history, number of targets and segments, prediction frequency, and integration with planning or operational systems.

The quote covers senior consultants only, a defined scope and the deliverables of each phase, including the backtesting report and the drift monitoring setup. Compute, external data subscriptions and licensed software are billed separately and estimated during the feasibility check.

Predictive models FAQ

How much history do we need for a forecast?

Enough to cover the patterns you want the model to learn. For seasonal demand, that usually means several full seasons of consistent data. The feasibility check tells you whether your history is sufficient or what to collect first.

How accurate will the model be?

We do not promise a figure before seeing the data. The backtest measures accuracy on past periods the model never saw, against a simple baseline, so you know the real gain before deciding to deploy.

What is a shadow deployment?

A period in which the model runs on live data and its predictions are logged but not acted on. Comparing them with real outcomes confirms the backtest before the model influences any decision.

Can predictive models work in real time?

Yes, when the decision needs it, as in fraud screening or pricing. Many forecasting uses only need daily or weekly batches, which are simpler and cheaper to run, so we match the frequency to the decision.

What if our planners do not trust the forecast?

We involve them from the start, show the backtest by segment and let them record overrides with a reason. Those overrides become data that improves the next model version, and trust follows the evidence.

How do you keep fraud models effective as fraud changes?

With shorter retraining cycles, anomaly detection alongside classification and close monitoring of analyst feedback. Confirmed cases flow back into training quickly, so the model follows changes in behavior.

Reviewed by

Julien Mauclair

Co-founder, technical delivery · Stralya

Last updated:

A forecast to build? Let’s talk

Reply within 24h · First call, no commitment